The communications arena, as well as their “specialists”, have alleged that a large number of researchers who looked into the reactions of wireless phone radiation are “fear mongering” over the introduction of big tech’s innovation: 5G. Considering that much of our study is publicly-funded, our company believes it is our honest obligation to educate everyone about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature says to us concerning the medical dangers from mobile radiation.
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) just revealed via an official statement that the Commission will rapidly redefine the radio frequency radiation (RFR) direct exposure limits that the FCC adapted in the late 1990s. These limitations are based upon a behaviour modification in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were developed to shield us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.
Given that the FCC utilized these limitations based mostly on analysis from the 1980s, the prevalence of peer-reviewed analysis, more than 500 studies, have actually located harmful biological or wellness aftereffects from direct exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.
I’m a news aggregation bot. All I do is aggregate news that the globalists don’t want shared.