Like & Follow Us!

Schiff Strategy Backfires! Witness Debunks  Many Leftist Narratives

Schiff Strategy Backfires! Witness Debunks Many Leftist Narratives

So far, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s mock court sideshow has actually been nothing more than the staging of a real impeachment query. All the appearances of a real hearing exist, simply without the speed bumps of open hearings or stories inconsistent with Schiff’s narrative.

The California Democrat’s investigation has actually been carried out without offering Republicans power to summon witnesses nor allowing the White House legal counsel any ability to take part. No records are available, and leaks have clearly been hand selected to damage the President. Schiff even went as far as attempting to close down lines of questioning from GOP lawmakers, according to records.

While the policies transformed a little bit with House Democrats electing Thursday to expand the impeachment investigation and also recommending to make it public, the inequality has merely been alleviated a tiny amount.

The tight fisted control Schiff and Dems have leveraged over the impeachment narrative lapsed briefly on Thursday when National Security Council official Tim Morrison gave testimony on Capitol Hill.

The basic takeaway from Morrison’s testament was that he substantiated previous testimony which asserted U.S. army aide to Ukraine was frozen by the Trump admin subject to the Ukrainian government beginning specific investigations.

Take a look at this report from CNN:

“Tim Morrison, the top Russia and Europe adviser on the National Security Council, also told House impeachment investigators that he was advised by then-White House official Fiona Hill to stay away from the parallel Ukraine policy being pursued by Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, according to one of the sources.

“Morrison said in his closed-door testimony that he was concerned the July 25 call transcript between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would leak and could have negative ramifications, according to multiple sources and a copy of his opening statement obtained by CNN. But he also made the point that he saw nothing wrong with the July call.” (Emphasis added.)

That’s the problem with Morrison’s opening declaration, at the very least the angle taken by Schiff along with the Democrats. The NSC authorities negated many of their stories, including that there was anything illegal en regards to the call upon which the initial whistleblower grievance was based.

Morrison discredited a number of various other talking points that have arisen from the hearings.

He testified that he believed the records of Trump’s phone call with Zelensky was exact– as opposed to Tuesday’s statement from NSC officer Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who claimed there were 2 essential parts of the transcript that were missing vital words and expressions.

He also stated that Trump was worried regarding corruption in Ukraine, increasing the likelihood that even if the head of state was pushing the Ukrainians to chase after examinations and even if they were suspicious in nature, they weren’t done especially for his political advantage.

Most notable for the head of state as well as his protectors: Morrison testified that he believed the Ukrainians were unaware that the aide was frozen till late August, much later than the timeline being reported in the media.

On the first 2 counts: During his deposition, Morrison affirmed that he “reviewed the Memorandum of Conversation [‘MemCon’] of the July 25 phone call that was released by the White House.

“I listened to the call as it occurred from the Situation Room. To the best of my recollection, the MemCon accurately and completely reflects the substance of the call. I also recall that I did not see anyone from the NSC Legal Advisor’s Office in the room during the call. After the call, I promptly asked the NSC Legal Advisor and his Deputy to review it.

“I had three concerns about a potential leak of the MemCon: first, how it would play out in Washington’s polarized environment; second, how a leak would affect the bipartisan support our Ukrainian partners currently experience in Congress; and third, how it would affect the Ukrainian perceptions of the U.S.-Ukraine relationship. I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed.”

It’s fairly obvious what the last sentence contradicts.

As for the remainder of that fragment of testament, it increases concerns regarding what Vindman affirmed on Tuesday relating to the authenticity of the telephone call transcript. While the edits that Vindman claims he recommended and was declined weren’t specifically substantive, they were still taken upon with a particular gusto on both Capitol Hill as well as in the media.

Morrison additionally mentions issues regarding a leakage of the records; once more, an usual story that’s arisen over the past couple of weeks has actually been that the records was transferred to a safe NSC server to hinder any kind of analysis of the call. NSC Legal Advisor John Eisenberg, the person Morrison is discussing in this part of his opening declaration, is additionally the one who relocated it there; if the management was worried concerning a leakage rather than protecting the head of state, this does not come to be a concern.

Morrison’s statement was also contradictory to reports that the Ukrainians were aware of the freeze by the start of August.

“I have no reason to believe the Ukrainians had any knowledge of the review until August 28, 2019. Ambassador [William] Taylor and I had no reason to believe that the release of the security sector assistance might be conditioned on a public statement reopening the Burisma investigation until my September 1, 2019 conversation with Ambassador [Gordon] Sondland,” Morrison said.

“Even then I hoped that Ambassador Sondland’s strategy was exclusively his own and would not be considered by leaders in the Administration and Congress, who understood the strategic importance of Ukraine to our national security.

“I am pleased our process gave the President the confidence he needed to approve the release of the security sector assistance. My regret is that Ukraine ever learned of the review and that, with this impeachment inquiry, Ukraine has become subsumed in the U.S. political process.”

Lastly, there was this little bit: “I was aware that the President thought Ukraine had a corruption problem, as did many others familiar with Ukraine. I was also aware that the President believed that Europe did not contribute enough assistance to Ukraine.”

Once more, if the help to Ukraine was frozen based upon the condition that Trump desired criminal investigations into possible Ukrainian corruption, that’s totally legitimate. If he did it to specifically harm his political opponent: Joe Biden — that isn’t.

It’s legitimate if he held up the help due to the fact that he assumed Europe had not been paying their fair share… But not as ammo against Uncle Joe & son.

Morrison’s statement leads towards the former conclusion in both translations.

This element of Morrison’s statement really did not obtain a great deal of press because it wasn’t good press for Adam Schiff or the Dems. That doesn’t get clicks. So what the media pushed instead, in serious tones, was exactly how this was yet another horrible and incriminating day for Donald Trump and team.

Source: Schiff Strategy Backfires When Nat’l Sec. Witness Undercuts Multiple Dem Narratives

Like & Follow Us!

22 thoughts on “Schiff Strategy Backfires! Witness Debunks  Many Leftist Narratives

  1. The subsequent time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I imply, I do know it was my choice to learn, however I actually thought youd have something attention-grabbing to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could repair in the event you werent too busy in search of attention.

  2. Thank you for another excellent article. Exactly where else could anybody get that kind of data in this kind of a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I am to the appear for such information and facts.

  3. What I wouldnt get for possess a controversy along with you relating to this. You just let them know a lot of things that come from nowhere fast in which Internet marketing fairly certain Identity use a fair picture. Your weblog is extremely good creatively, After all people will not be bored stiff. But other people who is able to see past the video clips and also the design will not be thus pleased using your generic knowledge of this specific matter.

  4. Hi, Neat post. There is an issue with your web site in web explorer, would test this¡K IE nonetheless is the market leader and a large element of folks will omit your excellent writing because of this problem.

  5. Oh my goodness! a fantastic post dude. Thank you Even so I will be experiencing issue with ur rss . Don’t know why Can not subscribe to it. Will there be any person getting identical rss problem? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx

  6. Exceptional document and even quick to help you recognize justification. Exactly how can As i continue acquiring concur to help you place component belonging to the post inside new newssheet? Getting right credit standing you that publisher and even web page link with the internet site won’t even be a concern.

  7. Beautiful post. It seems that a good many stages are banking on the originality factor. “Human beings are seventy percent water, and with some the rest is collagen.” by Martin Mull..

  8. I’m impressed, I have to admit. Really rarely can i encounter a weblog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you could have hit the nail on the head. Your thought is outstanding; the thing is an element that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. My business is very happy which i found this in my find some thing concerning this.

  9. Wonderful blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News. Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Cheers

  10. Helpful blog post and thanks for sharing. Some things in here I haven’t thought about before, I would like to use this moment to say that I really like this blog. It has been a great resource of knowledge for me. Thank you so much!

  11. You need to get involved in a tournament for starters of the highest quality blogs on-line. I am going to suggest this web site!

  12. I’m impressed, I must say. Truly rarely do I encounter a weblog that’s both educative and entertaining, and without a doubt, you’ve hit the nail on the head. Your notion is outstanding; ab muscles an element that there are not enough persons are speaking intelligently about. I’m happy i always found this at my search for something relating to this.

  13. The difference between the right word and the almost right word is more than just a fine line! it’s like the difference between a lightning bug and the lightning!

  14. You created some decent points there. I looked online for the issue and found most individuals should go in addition to with your internet site.

  15. This design is incredible! You definitely know how to keep a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Wonderful job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!

  16. Thanks for this post. I definitely agree with what you are saying. I have been talking about this subject a lot lately with my mother so hopefully this will get him to see my point of view. Fingers crossed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Be the First to Know!

Get around social media censors & sign up directly with us. We’ll keep you updated on breaking news as it comes out! (No Spam, we promise)

Add our Progressive Web App to your device by clicking “Add to Home” or the icon in your browser’s address bar. You’ll experience much faster load times.

Remember to enable notifications!